Skip to main content

Perflutren lipid microspheres for echocardiogram contrast: a clinical case of anaphylaxis not caused by PEG

Abstract

Background

Perflutren lipid microsphere suspension, sold under the brand name Definity®, is a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent. The microspheres contain octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas encapsulated by an outer lipid shell of phospholipids and a polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated phospholipid. Anaphylaxis to perflutren lipid microsphere is very rare, with only one case report clearly attributing the reaction to the PEG excipient. We report a novel case of anaphylaxis likely caused by a non-PEGylated component of Definity®.

Case presentation

Our patient is a healthy 54-year-old female, who underwent an exercise stress transthoracic echocardiogram using Definity® as an enhancing agent. She experienced anaphylaxis within 15 min of injection. Symptoms resolved after she was treated with diphenhydramine and epinephrine, followed by a systemic corticosteroid and ondansetron in the Emergency Department. The patient underwent allergy testing at our clinic for Definity® and various PEG-containing substances. While all PEG products tested negative, she had positive intradermal tests to Definity®. She also had negative skin prick testing to PEG 8000 and passed an oral challenge to PEG 3350, thus ruling out PEG as the causative agent of anaphylaxis.

Conclusions

Our case report highlights a previously undocumented instance of anaphylaxis to Definity® not caused by PEG. We suspect the reaction to be an IgE-mediated response to a non-PEGylated component of Definity®. An alternative explanation for the reaction could be a complement activation-related pseudoallergy. This report provides critical information to physicians on the potential risks of using Definity® and contributes to growing research surrounding the profile of Definity®.

Background

Perflutren lipid microsphere suspension, sold under the brand name Definity®, is a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) widely used across North America. Injected intravenously, its physical acoustic properties allow delineation of the inner border of the left ventricle of the heart, which clarifies images during echocardiograms. Upon activation, the microspheres are made of octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas encapsulated by an outer lipid shell, consisting of phospholipids and a PEGylated phospholipid (MPEG5000 DPPE) with an approximate molecular weight (MW) of 5750 [1, 2]. Anaphylactoid reactions to Definity® are very rare [3] and only one case report of anaphylaxis was clearly attributed to polyethylene glycol (PEG) [4].

Case presentation

We report a novel case of anaphylaxis to the non-PEGylated component of Definity®. Our patient is a healthy 54-year-old female, who underwent an exercise stress transthoracic echocardiogram at her cardiologist’s office, using Definity® as an enhancing agent. Within 15 min after injection and while walking on a treadmill, she developed urticaria on her arms that spread to the torso, followed by syncope. Upon arousal, she experienced emesis, urinary incontinence, tongue swelling, and dyspnea. According to a report from the patient’s husband, she was hypotensive before paramedic arrival. She was treated with diphenhydramine intravenously, and paramedics later gave her epinephrine. She also received a systemic corticosteroid and ondansetron while in the emergency department, where her symptoms resolved after several hours.

The patient came to our drug allergy clinic one month later and underwent skin prick testing (SPT) to PEG 3350 (1.7 mg/mL and 17 mg/mL) and intradermal testing (IDT) to activated Definity® (agitated with Vialmix® apparatus to form a milky-white liquid suspension of octafluoropropane encapsulated by lipid-shell microbubbles; 1:100 and 1:10 dilutions), methylprednisolone acetate (which contains PEG 3350; 0.4 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL) and methylprednisolone sodium succinate (which does not contain PEG 3350, as a control; 0.4 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL). Following negative SPT and IDT to PEG, she proceeded to a two-step oral challenge with PEG 3350 to a cumulative dose of 17 g. She remained under observation for more than 1 h without evidence of an immediate allergic reaction. However, the patient had a positive IDT to Definity® at both dilutions, with the injection sites becoming indurated with surrounding erythema and expanding outside the IDT sites 15 min after administration (Fig. 1). Definity® IDT at both concentrations were also administered in two controls with negative outcomes, decreasing the possibility of an irritant effect. On a separate day, she underwent SPT to PEG 8000 (5 g dissolved in 10 mL saline) with negative results. Based on the testing outcomes, we concluded that she had an IgE-mediated reaction to a non-PEGylated component of Definity®.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Skin testing results. The patient had appropriate responses to SPT controls. She tested negative for serial dilutions of PEG 3350 SPT. On IDT, she was only positive to perflutren (Definity®; both concentrations) at 15-minute read. On a separate day, SPT to PEG 8000 was negative (results not shown)

Discussion and conclusions

Polyethylene glycols, also known as macrogols, are hydrophilic molecules that are often used in medical, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic products. They are available in a range of molecular weights from 200 to 35,000 g/mol with PEG 3350 as a common ingredient in laxatives and bowel preparations. PEG derivatives are structurally similar polymers and are often used as drug excipients [5], as is the case for Definity® microspheres. Many severe immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions have been reported following the use of PEG 4000, 6000, 8000 and 20,000, [6] and in reports between 1989 and 2017, the US FDA identified 53 cases of anaphylactic reactions to bowel preparations or laxatives containing PEG [5]. Anaphylaxis to PEGylated UCAs have been reported in at least 11 cases of patients with prior PEG allergy [7]. However, reports specifically on Definity® have been rare overall. In a retrospective analysis, more than 66,000 administered doses of Definity® over a period of 4.5 ± 2.4 years were analyzed, of which only 8 serious adverse events were reported as probably related to Definity®. Thus, the incidence of anaphylaxis to Definity® was recorded to be 0.006% [3], although confirmatory allergy testing was not performed; thus, the mechanism(s) of the reactions were not determined.

To our knowledge, there is only one case report of an anaphylactic reaction to Definity® clearly attributed to the PEGylated part of the microsphere. The patient was a 58-year-old male who, within minutes of being given Definity® for a stress myocardial perfusion scan, developed urticaria, shortness of breath, and hypotension. Previously, he had developed swollen hands when handling paints containing high molecular weight PEG and anaphylaxis to oral PEG 3350 during preparation for a colonoscopy. He later tested positive on SPT to PEG 3350 and methylprednisolone acetate (containing PEG), and positive on IDT to triamcinolone acetonide (containing polysorbate 80). It was concluded that his immediate reactions to the PEG products and Definity® were due to an IgE-mediated reaction to PEG [4].

On the other hand, our patient had positive IDTs to Definity® but not to PEG-containing medications, and tolerated an oral challenge to PEG 3350. She also tested negative for PEG 8000 SPT, deeming the higher molecular weight PEG 5750 in Definity® to be an unlikely culprit. Definity® contains excipients in the buffer such as glycerin and propylene glycol (Table 1) which are often considered immunologically inert. Other excipients in Definity®, including sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate and sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (Table 1) can also be found in methylprednisolone sodium succinate [8], to which the patient tested negative. Chlorhexidine was not used as an antiseptic and the patient has no history of latex or chlorhexidine allergy, thus she was not tested for these allergens. In addition, our patient had exercise as a cofactor, which could have contributed to the severe presentation, but she generally tolerates physical activity.

Table 1 Composition of Definity® [2]

An alternative explanation for the patient’s reaction could be a complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA). The mechanism of UCA clearance in the bloodstream is through opsonization via activation of the complement system [7]. In addition, since many symptoms of CARPA are similar to IgE-mediated reactions, it is difficult to conclude the causative mechanism behind our patient’s anaphylaxis. In the retrospective analysis by Wei et al., 4 of the reactions to Definity were described as anaphylactiod and compatible with CARPA, with symptoms including hypotension, dyspnea, urticaria, and swelling of the face and throat. They all occurred within 15 min of administration and patients recovered after 4 to 8 h in the hospital after being treated with fluids, antihistamines, steroids, and/or epinephrine [3].

In summary, immediate hypersensitivity reactions to Definity® are very rare, with most reported cases attributing PEG as the likely allergen. We present the first documented case of anaphylaxis potentially triggered by a non-PEG component of Definity®. A plausible explanation could be a CARPA reaction. However, based on negative PEG testing results and positive IDTs to Definity®, we suspect the reaction was an IgE-mediated response to the non-PEGylated component of Definity®. This case highlights a very rare case of anaphylaxis to Definity® unrelated to the PEG excipient and the importance of physicians to be aware of this rare but critical situation.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

UCA:

Ultrasound contrast agent

MW:

Molecular weight

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

SPT:

Skin prick test

IDT:

Intradermal test

CARPA:

Complement activation-related pseudoallergy

References

  1. Lantheus Medical Imaging. Definity: Prescribing Information. Massachusetts: Lantheus Medical Imaging; 2024. https://www.definityimaging.com/sites/default/files/pdf/definity-pi.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2024.

  2. Lantheus MI Canada. Definity: Product Monograph. Montreal: Lantheus MI Canada; 2022. https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00067309.PDF. Accessed 30 Nov 2024.

  3. Wei K, Mulvagh SL, Carson L, Davidoff R, Gabriel R, Grimm RA, et al. The Safety of Definity and Optison for Ultrasound Image Enhancement: A Retrospective Analysis of 78,383 Administered Contrast Doses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(11):1202–1206. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.echo.2008.07.019.

  4. Krantz MS, Liu Y, Phillips EJ, Stone CA Jr. Anaphylaxis to PEGylated liposomal echocardiogram contrast in a patient with IgE-mediated macrogol allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(4):1416–1419.e3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.041.

  5. Stone CA, Liu Y, Relling MV, Krantz MS, Pratt AL, Abreo A, et al. Immediate Hypersensitivity to Polyethylene Glycols and Polysorbates: More Common Than We Have Recognized. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(5):1533–1540.e8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaip.2018.12.003.

  6. Caballero ML, Krantz MS, Quirce S, Phillips EJ, Stone CA. Hidden Dangers: Recognizing Excipients as Potential Causes of Drug and Vaccine Hypersensitivity Reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(8):2968–2982. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.002.

  7. Lindner JR, Belcik T, Main ML, Montanaro A, Mulvagh SL, Olson J, et al. Expert Consensus Statement from the American Society of Echocardiography on Hypersensitivity Reactions to Ultrasound Enhancing Agents in Patients with Allergy to Polyethylene Glycol. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021 Jul;34(7):707–708. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.echo.2021.05.002.

  8. Pfizer Canada ULC. Solu-Medrol: Product Monograph. Kirkland: Pfizer Canada ULC; 2025. https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00078468.PDF. Accessed 8 March 2025.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Echocardiography team at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre for their assistance in activating Definity®.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CW drafted the report and conducted preliminary background research. JC provided pharmacological details on the drugs used in testing. HL provided information and research on Definity®. EL performed drug allergy testing on the patient, interpreted results, and provided patient records. All authors revised, reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erika Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

A consent form was signed by the patient to report the case.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Campbell, J., Lea-Banks, H. et al. Perflutren lipid microspheres for echocardiogram contrast: a clinical case of anaphylaxis not caused by PEG. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 21, 22 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13223-025-00964-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13223-025-00964-5

Keywords