Skip to main content

Effective use of dupilumab for eosinophilic gastritis concomitant with severe asthma

Abstract

Background

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders characterized by gastrointestinal symptoms and eosinophilic inflammation in specific regions of the gastrointestinal tract. “Eosinophilic gastritis” (EoG) refers to the condition in which the stomach is involved. In patients with EoG, approved treatment options are restricted despite the high mortality associated with the condition. Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α subunit and inhibits the signaling pathways of both IL-4 and IL-13. The real-world data on the effectiveness of dupilumab for EoG are limited. We present the case of a patient with EoG and accompanying severe asthma who demonstrated improvement with dupilumab administration.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old woman who had been treated for asthma complained of worsening intermittent upper abdominal pain. Her dyspnea aggravated and she was admitted to our hospital for asthma exacerbation. Despite the improvement in her asthma symptoms with systemic corticosteroids, her abdominal pain persisted. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic mucosal biopsy revealed eosinophilic cell infiltration; therefore, the patient was diagnosed with EoG. Dupilumab administration was initiated for asthma, while improvement of secondary EoG was expected. Following dupilumab administration, both EoG and asthma symptoms, disease control, laboratory findings, endoscopic findings, and pathological findings improved. No adverse events have been reported after the dupilumab treatment.

Conclusion

This case report supports that dupilumab could be an effective treatment option for EoG and accompanying severe asthma.

Background

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders characterized by gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and eosinophilic inflammation in particular regions of the GI tract without known etiology of eosinophilia [1, 2]. International consensus recommendations have been established for the terminology and definitions of EGIDs [3]. The overall disease category is EGID. EGID is used as the umbrella term for GI disorders with pathologic eosinophilic infiltration without secondary causes. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the most common among EGIDs, with an estimated prevalence of 57 cases per 100,000 people in the United States [4]. This term is indicative of esophageal involvement alone, in which eosinophil infiltration is localized only in the esophagus without involvement of any other parts of the GI tract [5]. Any other site of involvement is referred to as non-EoE EGID, which is further categorized according to the location of eosinophil inflammation, such as eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) for the stomach, eosinophilic enteritis (EoN) for the small intestine, and eosinophilic colitis (EoC) for the colon.

Non-EoE EGID is a rare primary GI disorder of unknown etiology characterized by eosinophilic infiltration observed in histopathological examination of the intestinal mucosa extending from the esophagus to the rectum [6]. Non-EoE EGID causes a wide range of GI symptoms, including abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, bloating, or ascites [6]. The prevalence of non-EoE EGID is estimated to be 28 cases per 100,000 persons [7], while that of EoG is estimated at 6.3 cases per 100,000 persons [8]. Patients with non-EoE EGID experience more severe symptoms and a worse quality of life compared to those with EoE [9]. Of patients with non-EoE EGID, 46% had a history of allergy. Furthermore, bronchial asthma (27.8%) was the most commonly reported allergic disease [10]. Increased mortality was observed in patients with EoG and EoN [11].

The first-line treatment for EoE is proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Approximately 50% of the patients exhibit histological improvements following treatment with PPI [12].

Systemic glucocorticoids are the most frequently used agents for non-EoE EGIDs. Moreover, patients may undergo spontaneous remission with oral corticosteroids. However, in 60% of patients, the disease relapses after treatment with corticosteroids, with nearly half of the patients experiencing irregular exacerbations and persistent symptoms [13]. In addition to corticosteroids, viable treatment options include leukotriene receptor antagonists, histamine H1 receptor antagonists, mast cell stabilizers, dietary therapy, and immunosuppressants. However, the efficacy of these drugs has not been confirmed [14,15,16,17,18]. Despite the high mortality, the approved treatment options for EoG are restricted; therefore, drug options with diverse pharmacological effects are warranted.

Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α subunit and inhibits the signaling pathways of both IL-4 and IL-13. Dupilumab has been approved for patients with asthma [19, 20], atopic dermatitis [21], chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis [22], prurigo nodularis [23], chronic spontaneous urticaria [24], and eosinophilic esophagitis [25]. Approval for indications varies by country. The pathophysiology of EoG entails the activation of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 pathways [26]. Consequently, the inhibition of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling by dupilumab may prove effective for EoG. However, real-world data evidence regarding the efficacy of dupilumab in treating EoG remains scarce.

Here, we present a case in which EoG and accompanying severe asthma improved after dupilumab administration.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old woman, previously managed for asthma at a local hospital under GINA step 4 treatment for 7 years, presented to our hospital with dyspnea that commenced 1 day before admission. The diagnosis was asthma exacerbation, prompting the introduction of additional systemic corticosteroids and an inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonist, resulting in an improvement of her symptoms. The patient was discharged after 1 week of hospitalization. One month later, she visited for an unscheduled consultation due to worsening intermittent upper abdominal pain. The pain did not improve despite the use of analgesics and PPI. Around the same time, her dyspnea worsened, and she was hospitalized once again for a new asthma exacerbation. The laboratory findings from the second admission are presented in Table 1. The patient had no history of allergies to any particular food, and specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E tests for egg, milk, wheat, soybean, peanut, shrimp, and crab were negative. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed mild bronchial thickening. However, no ascites or intestinal wall thickening was observed (Fig. 1).

Table 1 Laboratory findings
Fig. 1
figure 1

Image findings. a Mild bronchial thickening in chest computed tomography. b No ascites or intestinal wall thickening is noted

Although asthma symptoms improved with systemic corticosteroid administration, the abdominal pain persisted. Upper GI endoscopy revealed erosive gastritis and fundic gland polyps (Fig. 2). On the other hand, examination of the esophagus and duodenum were normal. Mucosal biopsies were performed three times from the stomach. Mucosal biopsy revealed eosinophilic cell infiltration (Fig. 3). The number of eosinophils per high power field (HPF) was greater than 30 in 5 HPF, consistent with the histopathologic features of EoG [27]. Other GI disorders that cause eosinophilia were also ruled out. There were no findings suggesting Crohn's disease such as diarrhea, anal lesions, or anemia, and upper GI endoscopy did not reveal any findings characteristic of Crohn's disease. The patient did not have close contact with animals at work or as a pet. In addition, the patient did not eat raw freshwater fish, crabs, animal meat, reptiles, or organic vegetables. There were no such behaviors that increased the risk of parasitic infections. There were no findings suggestive of vasculitis, such as numbness, purpura, arthralgia, or myalgia, and PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA were negative, making the diagnosis of EGPA unlikely. Therefore, diagnosis of EoG was established.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gastrointestinal endoscopy image displaying erosive gastritis and fundic gland polyps

The patient experienced persistent symptoms of asthma and exacerbations despite optimized maximal GINA step 5 treatment. Therefore, biological therapies were incorporated into the treatment. The score of the asthma control test (ACT) was 10, indicating poor asthma control. Thus, dupilumab administration was initiated for asthma, while a secondary improvement in the EoG was expected. Before the drug administration, the serum eosinophil count was 726/µL.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pathological findings demonstrating increased gastric eosinophilic cell infiltration

Sixteen weeks after dupilumab administration, the patient’s EGID symptom score decreased from 35 to 3. For asthma, ACT scores improved from 10 to 25. After 92 weeks of administration, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) decreased from 133 parts per billion (ppb) to 14 ppb. Blood tests revealed a decrease in eosinophil count from 726/µL to 441/µL, while IgE levels decreased from 289 to 26.1 IU/mL. Endoscopic and pathological changes were observed at 184 weeks. The gastric mucosa was normal, with no signs of gastritis. Mucosal biopsies were performed two times from the stomach. In pathological examination, the number of eosinophils per HPF was 0–2 in 5 HPF (Fig. 4). No adverse events were observed after the dupilumab treatment.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gastrointestinal endoscopy and pathological examination findings after dupilumab administration. a Normal gastric mucosa without signs of gastritis. b Few eosinophilic cells

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of an adult with EoG concomitant with severe asthma, in whom both EoG and asthma improved with the administration of dupilumab. To date, cases of EoE that have demonstrated improvement with dupilumab treatment have been included in clinical trials [28] while evidence of this treatment’s efficacy has been observed in real-world data [29]. However, evidence of the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with EoG is limited to case reports and retrospective case series [30,31,32,33].

The biological agents for asthma, currently approved in Japan include mepolizumab, benralizumab, tezepelumab, omalizumab, and dupilumab.

Mepolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes IL-5. Additionally, mepolizumab does not improve clinical symptoms in patients with EoE [34]. Case reports have demonstrated the efficacy of mepolizumab in non-EoE EGIDs [35].

Benralizumab is an IL-5 receptor α (IL-5Rα)-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody that does not improve clinical symptoms in patients with EoE (NCT04543409). However, a phase III trial in patients with non-EoE EGIDs is currently ongoing (NCT05251909).

Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to thymic stromal lymphopoietin. A phase III trial is currently underway in patients with EoE (NCT05583227). No clinical trials or case reports of non-EoE EGIDs are available.

Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against human IgE that binds to the human FcγRIIb receptors. Clinical symptoms did not improve in patients with EoE who received omalizumab [36], while no additional progress was observed in non-EoE EGIDs in the phase III study completed in 2007 (NCT00084097).

Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against the IL-4 receptor α subunit and inhibits the signaling pathways of both IL-4 and IL-13. Dupilumab has been approved for patients with asthma [19, 20], atopic dermatitis [21], chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis [22], prurigo nodularis [23], chronic spontaneous urticaria [24], and eosinophilic esophagitis [25]. Additionally, dupilumab is effective for asthma exacerbations in patients with a baseline eosinophil count >150/µL or high FeNO > 25 ppb [20]. In our patient’s case, these criteria were met, allowing the initiation of dupilumab for asthma treatment. Furthermore, this drug is currently being assessed for EGID and has been approved for EoE [25]. In EoG, a phase II, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial is currently ongoing to assess the efficacy of dupilumab (NCT03678545).

Dupilumab is currently the most studied agent among the five monoclonal antibodies for EoE or non-EoE EGIDs; hence, dupilumab was the drug of choice in this case.

Systemic Th2 disorders have been speculated to be responsible for the course of EoG. Moreover, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 pathway activation and increased expression of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have been observed in the gastric tissues of patients with EoG [26]. Therefore, dupilumab may be effective owing to its pharmacological effect of suppressing the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways.

Aggravation of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia [20] or the development of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis [22] have been observed as adverse effects of dupilumab administration. No evident adverse effects were observed in our patient’s case.

This report may have certain limitations. First, this study reports one case. Further research on dupilumab is required. Secondly, biopsies were not performed on the esophagus, small bowel, or colon, so the possibility of EoE, EoN, or EoC occurring together cannot be completely ruled out. However, the patient did not feel symptoms in the esophagus, and the endoscopic examination was normal, with no characteristic findings of EoE. In addition, there were no lower GI symptoms such as diarrhea that would suggest involvement of the small bowel or colon, and CT scans did not reveal thickening of the intestinal wall that would suggest enteritis. Thus, there were no symptoms or findings on examination that strongly suggested the presence of complications of esophageal, small bowel, or colon. Therefore, this case was diagnosed as EoG. Thirdly, the safety of dupilumab has not been fully evaluated in patients with EoG concomitant with severe asthma. In clinical trial NCT03678545, patients with poorly controlled asthma (ACT score < 20) were excluded. Therefore, studies that include patients with severe asthma are warranted.

Conclusion

Dupilumab safely and effectively managed EoG concomitant with severe asthma. Therefore, dupilumab may be considered an effective therapeutic option for these patients.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

EGIDs:

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases

EoG:

Eosinophilic gastritis

IL :

Interleukin

FeNO :

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide

IgE :

Immunoglobulin E

GI :

Gastrointestinal

References

  1. Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(1):11–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonsalves N. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;57(2):272–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dellon ES, Gonsalves N, Abonia JP, Alexander JA, Arva NC, Atkins D, et al. International consensus recommendations for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease nomenclature. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(11):2474-84.e3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dellon ES, Jensen ET, Martin CF, Shaheen NJ, Kappelman MD. Prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(4):589-96.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kinoshita Y, Oouchi S, Fujisawa T. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases - pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergol Int. 2019;68(4):420–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pineton de Chambrun G, Dufour G, Tassy B, Riviere B, Bouta N, Bismuth M, et al. Diagnosis, natural history and treatment of eosinophilic enteritis: a review. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018;20(8):37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spergel JM, Book WM, Mays E, Song L, Shah SS, Talley NJ, et al. Variation in prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and initial management options for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases in the United States. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;52(3):300–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen ET, Martin CF, Kappelman MD, Dellon ES. Prevalence of eosinophilic gastritis, gastroenteritis, and colitis: estimates from a national administrative database. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62(1):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedell A, Taft T, Craven MR, Guadagnoli L, Hirano I, Gonsalves N. Impact on health-related quality of life in adults with eosinophilic gastritis and gastroenteritis: a qualitative assessment. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(5):1148–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinoshita Y, Furuta K, Ishimaura N, Ishihara S, Sato S, Maruyama R, et al. Clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(3):333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bledsoe AC, Garber JJ, Ye W, Roelstraete B, Murray JA, Ludvigsson JF. Mortality and cancer in eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders distal to the esophagus: nationwide cohort study 1990–2017. J Gastroenterol. 2022;57(10):735–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, Furuta GT, Spergel JM, Zevit N, et al. Updated international consensus diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: proceedings of the AGREE conference. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(4):1022-33.e10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pineton de Chambrun G, Gonzalez F, Canva JY, Gonzalez S, Houssin L, Desreumaux P, et al. Natural history of eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(11):950-6.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolukbas FF, Bolukbas C, Uzunkoy A, Baba F, Horoz M, Ozturk E. A dramatic response to ketotifen in a case of eosinophilic gastroenteritis mimicking abdominal emergency. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49(11–12):1782–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirai T, Hashimoto D, Suzuki K, Osawa S, Aonahata M, Chida K, et al. Successful treatment of eosinophilic gastroenteritis with suplatast tosilate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107(5):924–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Maeyer N, Kochuyt AM, Van Moerkercke W, Hiele M. Montelukast as a treatment modality for eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2011;74(4):570–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Friesen CA, Kearns GL, Andre L, Neustrom M, Roberts CC, Abdel-Rahman SM. Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of montelukast in dyspeptic children with duodenal eosinophilia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;38(3):343–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lucendo AJ, Serrano-Montalbán B, Arias Á, Redondo O, Tenias JM. Efficacy of dietary treatment for inducing disease remission in eosinophilic gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(1):56–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rabe KF, Nair P, Brusselle G, Maspero JF, Castro M, Sher L, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in glucocorticoid-dependent severe asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2475–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Castro M, Corren J, Pavord ID, Maspero J, Wenzel S, Rabe KF, et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2486–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M, Cather JC, Weisman J, Pariser D, et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2287–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bachert C, Han JK, Desrosiers M, Hellings PW, Amin N, Lee SE, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019;394(10209):1638–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yosipovitch G, Mollanazar N, Stander S, Kwatra SG, Kim BS, Laws E, et al. Dupilumab in patients with prurigo nodularis: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials. Nat Med. 2023;29(5):1180–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Maurer M, Casale TB, Saini SS, Ben-Shoshan M, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Bernstein JA, et al. Dupilumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (LIBERTY-CSU CUPID): two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024;154(1):184–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dellon ES, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hirano I, Chehade M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Dupilumab in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(25):2317–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caldwell JM, Collins MH, Stucke EM, Putnam PE, Franciosi JP, Kushner JP, et al. Histologic eosinophilic gastritis is a systemic disorder associated with blood and extragastric eosinophilia, TH2 immunity, and a unique gastric transcriptome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(5):1114–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Collins MH. Histopathologic features of eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43(2):257–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirano I, Dellon ES, Hamilton JD, Collins MH, Peterson K, Chehade M, et al. Efficacy of dupilumab in a phase 2 randomized trial of adults with active eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(1):111-22.e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Syverson EP, Rubinstein E. Real world experience with dupilumab in eosinophilic esophagitis in children and young adults at a Tertiary Care Pediatric Medical Center. JPGN Reports. 2022;3(2):e180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel N, Goyal A, Thaker A, Troendle D, Parrish C. A case series on the use of dupilumab for treatment of refractory eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022;75(2):192–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mori F, Renzo S, Barni S, Scarallo L, Giovannini M, Villanacci V, et al. Dupilumab treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease in an adolescent. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2023;34(6):e13973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sia T, Bacchus L, Tanaka R, Khuda R, Mallik S, Leung J. Dupilumab can induce remission of eosinophilic gastritis and duodenitis: a retrospective case series. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024;15(1):e00646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Arakawa N, Yagi H, Shimizu M, Shigeta D, Shimizu A, Nomura S, et al. Dupilumab leads to clinical improvements including the acquisition of tolerance to causative foods in non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. Biomolecules. 2023;13(1):112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Dellon ES, Peterson KA, Mitlyng BL, Iuga A, Bookhout CE, Cortright LM, et al. Mepolizumab for treatment of adolescents and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Gut. 2023;72(10):1828–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Caruso C, Colantuono S, Pugliese D, Di Mario C, Tolusso B, Gremese E, et al. Severe eosinophilic asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease associated to eosinophilic gastroenteritis treated with mepolizumab: a case report. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020;16:27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Clayton F, Fang JC, Gleich GJ, Lucendo AJ, Olalla JM, Vinson LA, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults is associated with IgG4 and not mediated by IgE. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(3):602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

No funding was required for this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TT drafted the manuscript. TT, RK, HM, AO, TN, JW, TY, and KK participated in the EoG treatment. KT provided treatment-related advice. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohito Takeshige.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

KT receives grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Kyorin, MSD, Nobelpharma, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, and Teijin; grants from Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MiZ, Mochida, Nipro, Nippon Shinyaku, Taiho, Toyama Chemical, Tsumura, Sanofi, Shionogi, and Torii; and personal fees from Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Meiji Seika, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Otsuka, Parexel, and Sumitomo Dainippon outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeshige, T., Koyama, R., Motomura, H. et al. Effective use of dupilumab for eosinophilic gastritis concomitant with severe asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 20, 68 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13223-024-00940-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13223-024-00940-5

Keywords