Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Specific outcome parameters of studies

From: Effectiveness of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in preventing infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Study

Treatment and control population outcomes

Baleeiro and Mull [32]31

Study design:

Case series

All have reported an improvement in symptoms and a decrease in sputum production and frequency of exacerbations

No other parameters measured

Cowan et al. [33]29

Study Design:

Retrospective Case series

-Mean rate of moderate/severe AECOPD 0.64 (81% decrease, p = 0.0001)

- Mean rate of moderate AECOPD 0.57 (decrease 66.7%, p = 0.001)

- Mean rate of severe AECOPD 0.07 (decrease 46.4%, p = 0.016)

- 1 hospitalization—reduction of mild exacerbations also was present, but numbers not reported due to the subjective nature of the data

Changes in AECOPD events/patient-year stratified by GOLD[5] COPD stage and baseline IgG Moderate COPD (n = 7) pre: 5.14 ± 2.85, post: 0.86 ± 1.13

Severe/very severe COPD pre: 4.14 ± 2.95, post: 0.43 ± 0.5

No bronchiectasis (n = 6) pre: 4.00 ± 2.8, post: 0.83 ± 1.07

With bronchiectasis pre: 5.13 ± 2.93, post: 0.50 ± 0.71

IgG ≥ 5.9 g/L (n = 7) pre: 4.29 ± 3.33, post: 0.29 ± 0.45

IgG < 5.9 g/L pre: 5.00 ± 2.45, post: 1.00 ± 1.07

Adverse Events

Among n = 14, 1 had transfusion reaction to IVIG and 13 did not report any adverse reaction

Cowan et al. [35]32

Study Design:

RCT

Study treatment adherence: 68.8 ± 5.7% (median: 85%) 18 patients (51.4%) adhered to 80% of their allocated treatment

Study control adherence: 59.4 ± 6.3% (median: 57%) 16 patients (45.7%) adhered to 80% of their allocated treatment

Study retention rate (treatment): 97.1% (n = 34). 1 withdrew consent. 3 died during the study period

Study retention rate (control): 91.4% (n = 32). 2 withdrew consent. 4 died during the study period

Intention-To-Treat (ITT):

Total number of AECOPD (number of patients with event): 56 (25) treated population & 48 (21) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals): 0.91(0.59–1.41)

AECOPD requiring hospitalization (n of patients with events): 16 (13) treated population & 20 (2) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals) 0.78 (0.37–1.65)

AECOPD requiring ED visits (n of patients with event): 12 (9) treated population & 2 (2) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals) 3.16 (0.64–15.60)

AECOPD managed as outpatients (n of patients with event): 28 (15) treated population & 26 (12) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals) 0.69 (0.37–1.30)

Per Protocol (PP):

Numbers of AECOPD (number of patients with event): 24 (12) treated population & 4 (3) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals): 0.98 (0.50–1.93)

AECOPD requiring hospitalization (n of patients with events): 4 (4) treated population & 4 (3) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals): 0.43 (0.07–2.49)

AECOPD requiring ED visits (n of patients with event): 5 (4) treated population & 1 (1) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals): 2.52 (0.23–27.7)

AECOPD managed as outpatients (n of patients with event): 15 (9) treated population & 19 (9) control population

Ratio rate (95% confidence intervals): 0.88 (0.39–1.97)

Adverse events (AE):

137 AE in 33 treated patients; Median (IQR): 2 (1–5)

126 AE in 27 control patients; Median (IQR): 3 (1–5)

(p = 0.55 compared to control)

Tolerability:

A higher number of patients continued to receive study treatment at week 48 in the IVIG group (58%) vs the control group (46%)

Treatment adherence for the treatment group was slightly better than the control group; however, no statistical analysis was done

McCullagh et al. 30

Study Design:

Case series

Treatment Group:

PFT Results:

FVC, % (Range): 75.3 (57–93) after IVIG treatment (n = 4)

FEV1, % (Range): 51.4 (34–70) after IVIG treatment (n = 5)

FEV1/FVC, % (Range): 50.4 (27–69) after IVIG treatment (n = 5)

Outcome Parameters after Treatment:

Number of exacerbations per year (Range):

3.7 (2–6) (n = 7) before IVIG treatment and 1 (0–4) (n = 6) after IVIG treatment

Hospitalizations for AECOPD (Range):

2.3 (1–5) (n = 7) before IVIG treatment and 0.83 (0–4) (n = 6) after IVIG treatment

ICU admissions for AECOPD:

0.1 (0–1) (n = 7) before IVIG treatment and 0 (n = 6) after IVIG treatment

Average number courses of prednisone per year (Range):

6.9 (0–12) (n = 7) before IVIG treatment and 2.5 (0–12) (n = 6) after IVIG treatment

Average annual number courses of antibiotics (Range):

6.7 (3–12) (n = 7) before IVIG treatment and 8.67 (2–12) (n = 6) after IVIG treatment

Oxygen use (Range):

0.6 (0–1) (n = 7) before IVIG treatment and 0.6 (0–1) (n = 7) after IVIG treatment

  1. AECOPD; acute exacerbation of COPD, NR; not reported